The Use of Humor to Help Promote Critical Thinking in a General Biology Classroom
Nancy L. Goodyear
Tested Studies in Laboratory Teaching, 1992, Volume 13
Abstract
In an effort to promote critical thinking among general biology students, a series of cartoons were collected for each of the major topics covered in a general biology course. Cartoons were used as an attention-gathering device. One question and five multiple-choice answers for the question were written for each cartoon. The cartoon, question, and answers were all made into a transparency. The transparencies were projected, and the students were asked to identify an interpretation, a conclusion, an assumption, and/or an observation from the given answers. All analyses were based on the cartoon being used. An interpretation is defined as an explanation of a situation that is based on no data. By contrast, a conclusion is an explanation of a situation which is based on data. An observation is what can be experimentally measured, and an assumption is a belief based on no evidence. If the student is asked to identify a correct answer, he or she is also asked to explain why the one answer is correct and why the other answers are incorrect. According to Piagetian theory a concept is completed when a student can justify his or her answer.
Keywords: critical thinking
University of Wyoming, Laramie (1991)
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok